registration is free , easy and welcomed !!!
Started by buzzardroost, May 31, 2016, 10:26:40 PM
Quote from: trkehunr93 on June 01, 2016, 01:31:45 PMIf you watch public land around the US right now you will see a big push to put all federal land under state control. One of the easiest things for a state to do is sell public land off when times are hard. A lot of our republican buddies are behind this at the federal level because they know once it's under state control whatever company or interested party can then more easily gain control of it. Not sure if this is the case in your state but out west it's a common fight. I hate to see something like this happen in the Eastern part of the US. We're fortunate in VA that our state keeps adding public land. I would be curious to know Alabamas reason for this closure. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Quote from: eddie234 on June 01, 2016, 06:14:14 PMQuote from: trkehunr93 on June 01, 2016, 01:31:45 PMIf you watch public land around the US right now you will see a big push to put all federal land under state control. One of the easiest things for a state to do is sell public land off when times are hard. A lot of our republican buddies are behind this at the federal level because they know once it's under state control whatever company or interested party can then more easily gain control of it. Not sure if this is the case in your state but out west it's a common fight. I hate to see something like this happen in the Eastern part of the US. We're fortunate in VA that our state keeps adding public land. I would be curious to know Alabamas reason for this closure. Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkReally? Your gonna make this a republican vs. democrat issue?
Quote from: trkehunr93 on June 01, 2016, 03:57:10 PMInteresting. I can see their reasoning for getting out of the WMA, hunting has nothing to do with their decision. If they are still connected to the state then their timber business would suffer, by how much who knows but if cutting trees pays the bills then the options seem limited. From what I've read this snake needs this protection but it still stinks. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Quote from: spaightlabs on June 01, 2016, 06:19:21 PMQuote from: eddie234 on June 01, 2016, 06:14:14 PMQuote from: trkehunr93 on June 01, 2016, 01:31:45 PMIf you watch public land around the US right now you will see a big push to put all federal land under state control. One of the easiest things for a state to do is sell public land off when times are hard. A lot of our republican buddies are behind this at the federal level because they know once it's under state control whatever company or interested party can then more easily gain control of it. Not sure if this is the case in your state but out west it's a common fight. I hate to see something like this happen in the Eastern part of the US. We're fortunate in VA that our state keeps adding public land. I would be curious to know Alabamas reason for this closure. Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkReally? Your gonna make this a republican vs. democrat issue?What - no similar reply to Spurs post?
Quote from: Spurs on June 01, 2016, 06:34:50 PMIt is pretty simple. Republicans are typically for state control, whereas, democrats are typically for federal control.
Quote from: Spurs on June 01, 2016, 06:34:50 PMThis (Scotch WMA) is an issue of the federal govt attempting to control a private companies abilities to manage their property.