"An Alabama victory was followed by a win by the democratic nominee, while a win by LSU signaled the Republican candidate being voted into office. It has been accurate for the past seven elections.
1984: LSU 16, Alabama 14. Ronald Reagan (R) demolishes Walter Mondale (D).
1988: LSU 19, Alabama 18. George H.W. Bush (R) defeats Michael Dukakis (D).
1992: Alabama 31, LSU 11. Bill Clinton (D) defeats George H.W. Bush (R).
1996: Alabama 26, LSU 0. Clinton (D) defeats Bob Dole (R).
2000: LSU 30, Alabama 28. George W. Bush (R) defeats Al Gore (D).
2004: LSU 26, Alabama 10. George W. Bush (R) defeats John Kerry (D).
2008: Alabama 27, LSU 21. Barack Obama (D) defeats John McCain (R).
GO TIGERS
I'm not a fan of either team. Saying that, before I saw this I would have to say I would prefer a win by the tide bc I despise LSU and most of their fan base. But if a Bama win means four more years of Barry then go tigers
ROLL TIDE! The election ain't got crap to do with the butt whooping that LSU has coming tomorrow. ROLL TIDE ROLL and go Mitt and Ryan! Amen!
Guess I'll be watching that game! :newmascot:
Geaux Tigers!
If this even has the slightest chance to predict our countries future, then let go LSU
Since most LSU players are felons and can't vote I guess it will be Bama... :goofball:
Time to break that trend. Roll Tide.
not much of a butt whooping, I thought it was a great game even though we lost.
In contrast, consider the home loss by the Washington Redskins.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/gameon/2012/11/04/nfl-redskins-rule-romney/1681023/